Editorial standards and corrections
Accuracy, usefulness and transparent limits matter more to us than the number of URLs.
Research and evidence
For factual or safety-critical claims, we aim to rely on credible original sources, such as official documentation, manufacturers and scientific or public-health institutions. Where available, articles link directly to supporting material. A link to a source does not mean the source approves our article.
Review and updates
A publication or modification date is added when the content has actually been revised. Older guides may be brief and are being improved; we do not represent every page as expert-reviewed. Technical compatibility, regulations and health guidance can change, so verify current information at the linked source.
Translations and automation
The site is multilingual, but not every article exists in every language. We do not want to publish thousands of thin automated translations solely to attract search clicks. Localizations must preserve the meaning and safety context of the original.
Corrections and transparency
If you spot a mistake, you can propose a correction in the public project issue tracker. Do not post names, passwords, medical records or other private information in public issues. We aim to fix consequential errors and make the corrected content clear.